Duke
search
home for donors for media for prospective students contact us
About Academic Programs Research Divisions and Centers People News and Events Facilities and Technology Career Services
Forum
The Log
Action
Scope
sightings
Nature and Nurture
Honor Roll
Monitor
dukenvironment home

Boat Bottoms, Barnacles and Modern Medicine:

Dan Rittschof Hopes the Drug Store Will Offer a Safe Substance to Keep Barnacles Off Boats

By Tinker Ready

There are happy clams and for a while, there may have been a few extra cheerful barnacles in Professor Dan Rittschof’s lab. In his search for a new compound to keep the pesky shellfish from clinging to boats, the Nicholas School zoologist fed small doses of a popular antidepressant to barnacles. He wasn’t thinking the medicine would relax the tiny arthropods so they would loosen their costly and invasive grip. Antidepressants just happened to be among the drugs he used to test the theory that human pharmaceuticals might chemically—and safely—thwart a barnacle’s ability to settle on ships.

The tests established proof of principle. Now comes the hard part.

After 20 years of trying to find a replacement for the effective but toxic tin-laden paint that protects the hulls of most of the world’s ships, Rittschof learned that there are no simple solutions. The original idea was to find something that was environmentally benign, so it made sense to look for naturally occurring compounds. And, there seemed to be candidates among the many marine organisms that continuously produce antifoulants. But, “natural” does not necessarily mean simple or benign. Rittschof found the technical, financial and regulatory barriers to bringing such a product to market prohibitive.

“I pretty much had reached a dead end,” he said. “I went from natural products, which are relatively complex models, to looking for things that were a dollar a pound that prevent barnacle settlement.”

Willing to cast his intellectual net in places others might overlook, Rittschof may have found what he was looking for in his medicine cabinet. By recognizing the metabolic similarities in humans and barnacles, Rittschof and a collaborating group in Singapore have identified many common medications that prevent the critters from attaching to boats and pilings.

But it took two decades and six untapped patents before Rittschof reached that point.

The stakes in this search are extremely high. Boats encrusted with barnacles, algae and other shellfish are slower and burn more fuel. Virtually all of the world’s boats—cargo ships, cruise liners, oil tankers and pleasure craft—use paint laced with toxic tributylin (TBT) to keep them off. In the 1970s, the TBT paint was seen as an improvement over older lead and arsenic-based coatings. But, studies found that the compound can persist in the environment and decimate sea life, including human foods such as oysters, clams and mussels.

In response to the unacceptable environmental impacts of TBT, the World Maritime Organization, an arm of the United Nations, is banning the substance as of 2003. In July, the European Union—which banned the use of TBT and other organotins on pleasure boats in 1989—extended the ban for all member ships. As a result, some companies have turned to copper-based paints. But they too can be harmful and are banned in some countries.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

photo captions: 1. Dan Rittschof examines fouled rods. 2. Antifouling experiments in progress involving paint substances. 3. Jeanne Rittschof makes research notes.
Home