Personal tools
You are here: Home From the trenches Tali's Blog CNN Drops The “E-word”
  NICHOLAS INSIDER: get the inside scoop on duke's school of the environment
     learn about us through:  the green grok   |   STUDENT BLOGS   |   travel blogs   |   multimedia   |   my nicholas (profiles)   |   itunesu   |    facebook   |   insider home

CNN Drops The “E-word”

by Tali Trigg Mar 02, 2009

Windmills. PV-collectors. Geothermal. Imagine my surprise when at the end of a CNN segment, alternative energy symbols flashed by the screen to introduce a recurring “Energy Issues” special. Who knew? I sat up straight with baited breath and took in a segment on waste-to-energy.

The technology, which is rather self-explanatory, was praised as hitting two birds with one stone: waste-to-energy technology could lessen the amount trash piling up on landfills as well as provide a cleaner-than-coal* fuel input. And then, the segment comes to a close as the reporter, named Poppy (believe it), states, “…however, environmentalists say that…”

What now? What do these winy, narrow-minded environmentalists want this time? Why are these environmentalist types constantly opposing technological innovations with economic potential? Why can’t they just let lying dogs lay?

These pesky folks were quoted as being concerned with mercury emissions from waste-to-energy technology. As you can probably divine by now, my beef is the implication that environmentalists are single-minded neo-Luddites. Instead, what if Poppy had used the term “experts” or “industry experts”? Would the implications have changed?

We have known for some time that the “E-word” – Environmentalist – is a dirty word, but it can often be hard to peg down why. Now I for one have a better idea of why that might be. Thanks CNN.

So, what should CNN have done differently? Framed it differently? Used the word “experts”? Or, do we need a new term to break with the past? Do we need to invent a new term that is associated with people who are informed human beings who know what mercury can do to the human body, people who want a strong economy with equitable jobs, and people who push for cutting-edge, technological innovations anytime, anyplace? You tell me.


---

*This depends on what we mean by “clean” of course. WTE technology should result in lower sulfur, methane, and CO2 emissions for example, but as always, further scrutiny is advised.

P.S. I recently came across a well-written, accessible Electric Car Guide. Check it out.

Return to Tali's posts >
Document Actions
  • Send this
  • Print this

New label

Posted by Adam Klaers at Mar 05, 2009 10:22 AM
Tali,
Here are a few ideas for how to classify/label people with a concious focus on the environment and the econmy.
eco-scientist - somebody who has a understanding how science and enviornment work together.
eco-citizen - an informed citizen who is aware how individual choices effect the environment.
eco-euntrepenues - euntrepenues willing to take a risk for the better of our environment
eco-revolutionaries - people willing to make waves and go against the grain for the well being of our planet.

Waste to Energy

Posted by Robyn at Mar 05, 2009 11:03 AM
Ottawa has actually had a pilot plasma-gasification plant up and running for a few years now (I wrote an article about it back in 2006 and got an impromptu tour of the facilities and the landfill site they work out of). They're now building a bigger plant that can process more garbage... it's pretty cool, you should check it out!

http://www.plascoenergygroup.com/

Plasma-gasification

Posted by Daniel Kolomeets-Darovsky at Mar 09, 2009 07:30 AM
Plasma-arc is an interesting technology, with it's own problems, like gasification. However, after doing a practicum project for an engineering class last semester I must say my impression was that its problems are quite large (I did contact Plasco, by the way). For one, to attain it's high temperatures, it must have a large input of energy, which could be used for residential, commercial or other and more efficiently. Also, its commercial scale is only nascent, even though Florida just signed on for a project there. In a more holistic sense, it may have the perverse incentive to give the green light for us to continue the wasteful and superfluous ways of our society.

As one gentleman put it in an interview, we should think harder at using a technology that evolved from the way we got rid of radioactive medical waste, and I believe still probably do.

What is 'waste' anyway? In essence, there is no such thing. Plastic, metal and glass can be reused and recycled. Organic material can be composted (see what San Francisco is doing). If anything, we should be exploring how we think about these things. Not waste-to-energy but think-to-energy...


New vernacular

Posted by Daniel Kolomeets-Darovsky at Mar 09, 2009 07:30 AM
As you suggested, 'informed human being.' We could use more of those :) . Has a nice mundane but accurate ring to it. You could also always go with "Patriot Expert," since no one will say no to that, unless they're French or something (see: Freedom Fries" - even though 'french' in 'french fries' refers to the name of the cut, but being an informed human being is no fun, eh?).

I guess this even begs the question of why this has to be done. All our 'financial experts' didn't help us with the current economic situation (see Daily Show tearing CNBC a new one), 'political analysts' don't analyze anything but their own preconceived notions and beliefs. Perhaps the term 'expert' has been used so wantonly that not calling environmentalists or 'eco-experts' or treehuggers (take your pick) as 'experts' may give them more credence than anything else if people would only think for a minute (see: the failure of modern media and journalism). As a Taoist would say, the act of non-action may be the best action of all!

Ciao.

Environmental reporting

Posted by Daniel Kolomeets-Darovsky at Mar 13, 2009 11:39 AM
A great piece about this very topic in Time today...

http://www.time.com/[…]/0,8599,1882045,00.html

Tali Trigg

Tali Trigg

Tali Trigg is a second year MEM in the Energy & Environment track. His interests are in transportation, energy and communication.

learn more about Tali >