In wake of hurricane, rich towns
get $15 million for sand
Quotes Orrin Pilkey
05/29/04
By Gilbert M. Gaul
The Washington Post
Also published on 5/30 and 5/31 in: Houston Chronicle,
Seattle Times, Charlotte Observer, Jackson (Miss.)
Clarion-Ledger, Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Wichita
Eagle, Columbia State, Winston-Salem Journal,
Wilmington Morning Star, Tallahassee Democrat,
Myrtle Beach Sun News, Sarasota (Fla.) Herald-Tribune.
EMERALD ISLE, N.C. — The morning after Hurricane
Isabel hit in September, Town Manager Frank Rush
dashed off an e-mail.
"The town of Emerald Isle was extremely
fortunate, and sustained very little damage,"
Rush wrote on Sept. 19 to town officials. "Beach
erosion ... is minimal."
Yet Emerald Isle turned to the government for
help. After the resort was declared part of a
federal natural-disaster area, the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) awarded nearly $1.5 million
for street signs, tennis-court lights and sand
for the resort's carefully manicured beaches.
"I have a great deal of difficulty using
FEMA for wealthy beach towns getting money for
sand," said Emily Farmer, former mayor of
the town of 3,500. "Emerald Isle basically
uses FEMA as an insurance policy."
It is not alone.
Dozens of wealthy beach towns and coastal communities
received tens of millions of dollars in taxpayer-funded
disaster relief after Isabel, records obtained
by The Washington Post under the Freedom of Information
Act show.
The bulk of the money was used to clear debris
and pay for emergency workers' overtime. Hundreds
of thousands of dollars, however, were used to
repair flagpoles, signs, bike paths and ballparks.
And, in what some environmental groups and regulators
say is a troubling development, the federal agency
is paying for an estimated $15 million worth of
sand.
Emerald Isle "was a declared area and they
were an eligible applicant and they were funded,"
said Paul Wilson, a disaster-recovery specialist
in FEMA's Atlanta office. Agency officials did
not respond to requests for additional comment.
Why is the disaster-relief agency paying for
sand? Under FEMA policies, beaches such as those
in Emerald Isle are viewed as part of the public
infrastructure, similar to a water plant or an
electric utility. As long as beaches are maintained
and there is a federally declared disaster — such
as a hurricane — a community can apply for funds
to replace washed-away sand.
The rationale is that FEMA-funded beaches and
sand dunes protect property and reduce storm damage.
But some environmentalists say that FEMA, by paying
for sand, is encouraging risky development in
places that people should be avoiding, and exposing
the federal treasury to an endless cycle of bailouts.
"There is no emergency if you stay out of
harm's way," said Orrin Pilkey,
a Duke University geologist and longtime critic
of federally funded beach fills. "It's only
when people build on the shoreline that it becomes
dangerous and you get all of these other problems."
Many towns would have turned to the Army Corps
of Engineers in the past. Although better known
for building bridges and dredging harbors, the
corps also has served as the largest source of
federal sand dollars for eroding beaches. Since
the mid-1950s, it has spent an estimated $1.5
billion in inflation-adjusted dollars on sand.
But those projects have been criticized in recent
years as wasteful, and the Bush administration's
new budget has called for an end to new projects.
So beach towns are looking for new sources of
funds. Some, including Emerald Isle, are turning
to FEMA.
"We view the beach as part of our infrastructure,"
said Rush, the town's mayor. "Obviously,
the reason folks come to Emerald Isle is that
we have a nice beach out there."
Rush noted that FEMA also makes payments — in
the event of a natural disaster — to people who
live near flood-prone rivers or in earthquake
zones. Paying those who live near an eroding shoreline
is no different, he said. "Everyone in this
country lives in a dangerous place."
North Carolina for nearly three decades experienced
a relatively quiet period of hurricanes. But that
trend reversed in the mid-1990s and the coast
since has been buffeted. The hurricanes and subsequent
disaster-relief payments have prompted increased
efforts by beach towns to build up their shorelines.
Erosion rates along the Outer Banks vary, sometimes
within towns. Areas in Kitty Hawk, South Nags
Head and Rodanthe have lost most of their beaches,
leaving vacation homes defenseless against the
surf.
Dozens of homes were condemned after Isabel undercut
pilings, exposed septic systems or swept them
off concrete slabs. FEMA is spending millions
of dollars in Nags Head to create an emergency
dune to protect rental properties in an area where
condemned houses lean into the surf.
Dave Clark, director of public works in Nags
Head, said the emergency berm will buy homeowners
time as the town and county explore other ways
to shore up the beach.
FEMA also has approved berms for Kitty Hawk and
Kill Devil Hills, but is negotiating prices. In
Hatteras Village, the agency paid for a berm but
declined to say how much. It paid $6.2 million
to fill in an inlet cut by Isabel near Frisco.
The Dare County beach towns are seeking a 50-year
commitment from the Army Corps of Engineers to
widen their beaches with sand pumped from offshore.
The plan has been approved, Dare County Planner
Ray Sturza said, but there is no money appropriated
in the federal budget.
The beach towns hope to persuade Congress to
put money back in the budget for beach fills.
Meanwhile, the county is thinking of doing its
own sand replenishment, which would make it eligible
in the future for FEMA aid.
And a growing number of property owners are taking
matters into their hands. After Isabel, hundreds
hired contractors to bulldoze sand into protective
barriers in front of their oceanfront homes. Under
state law, bulldozers are supposed to scrape down
only one foot into the sand. But there aren't
enough regulators, and no one knows how much sand
actually was moved.
Media contact: Tim Lucas, 919/613-8084
or tdlucas@duke.edu
|