Environment General Courses (EOS)
graduate level, taught in Durham
298.07 Climate
Change Policy
Course Description: This
course is designed for students in the MEM Global
Environmental Change Program but could be taken
by others in the MEM program or elsewhere. The
course focuses on options for addressing the
global warming threat. The main purpose is to
examine what the issues are and the options available.
The course will primarily involve discussion
of key papers and material related to the nature
and status of international agreements (Kyoto
Protocol), bilateral or unilateral efforts (ex.,
the new California initiative), and perspectives
from developing countries. Topics will include
details of Kyoto Protocol and the California
initiative, carbon trading, and technological
alternatives (wind, solar, conservation, nuclear,
clean coal, etc). Class project will focus on
strategies for technical and political implementation
of new or existing policies. Class structure
will mainly involve discussion of key papers
and include lectures/visits by outside specialists.
There will be also weekly group discussions of
policy/science developments taken from news,
journals, and websites. Three credits.
Instructor: Thomas Crowley. Requirements:
prior course on global warming/climate or permission
of the instructor.
Example Syllabus (by topic)
and guest lecturers (not finalized)
- Scientific aspects of greenhouse
warming (brief review)
- Ethical issues – “to act or not to
act”, balancing proposals with other world
needs (poverty, clean water, etc.)
- Kyoto Protocol – status, structure,
limitations
- Policy Analysis Methods (Deborah
Rigling Gallagher, Lori Bennear)
- Economic considerations (Randy Kramer,
Nicholas School, ESP Div.)
- Carbon trading (speaker be to named
later)
- U. S. Policy developments (Tim Profeta,
Nich. Institute)
- Domestic litigation (Jim Saltzman,
Duke Law School)
- California here
I come
- Some positive actions: Germany,
the U.K., and Japan
- Perspective from the Developing World
- “Grounds up” initiatives
- “Greasing the Wheel” – what realistically
can be politically done to “unstick” the
present dilemma?
Sample Papers for Reading:
Hoffert, M. et al., 2002, Advanced technology
paths to global climate stability: Energy for
a greenhouse planet. Science, v 298, pp 981-987.
Houghton, J., 2004. Why should we be concerned?
(Chapter 8) in Global Warming, The Complete Briefing
(3rd Ed.). Cambridge Univ. Press.
Course Structure:
Classes will meet
twice a week, with one session devoted to roundtable
discussion of a particular paper and the next
session devoted to followup discussions, extensions,
etc; this session will be led by students.
We plan to have at least 4-5 visitors
from the Duke or UNC faculty or from industry
(e.g., Duke Energy, and their plans for a nuclear
plant) to provide input, lead discussions, etc.
Several professors have already consented, others
need to check their schedule for availability.
There will be one class project
whose topic will be established in conjunction
with students at the time of the course – it
could for example involve designing policy options
for implementing a particular strategy.
There will be additional independent
projects that students will be evaluated on.
The topic is of the student’s choosing and students
must give an oral presentation.
Grading is based on class participation
(15%), homework (10%), the student’s own project
(50%), and contributions to a class project (25%). |