Personal tools
You are here: Home Climate Update: Of Ice and Men
  NICHOLAS INSIDER: get the inside scoop on duke's school of the environment
      learn about us through:  THE GREEN GROK   |   student blogs   |   travel blogs   |   multimedia   |   my nicholas (profiles)   |   itunesu   |    facebook   |   insider home

Climate Update: Of Ice and Men

by Bill Chameides | Oct 13, 2009
posted by Erica Rowell (Editor)

Permalink |  Comments (6)
Climate Update: Of Ice and Men

The year 2009 now ranks third for the lowest extent of summer sea ice in the Arctic, since satellite records have been kept. (NSDIC.org)

If ice is the canary in the climate mine, the canary is melting.

Arctic Sea Ice Trend

Much of the Arctic Ocean is covered by ice that waxes and wanes with the seasons. In the winter, the extent of the ice grows and in the summer it shrinks, reaching a minimum in September.

With global warming, the extent of sea ice in the Arctic has been shrinking — by about 34 percent over the last 30 years (see graphic below). In total the average area of September sea ice has decreased over this period by more than 700,000 square miles — size-wise, that's bigger than the state of Alaska.

Arctic sea ice extent 1979-2009
September ice extent from 1979 to 2009 shows a continued decline. Since 1979, the rate of sea ice decline for the month of September has now increased to 11.2 percent per decade. Credit: National Snow and Ice Data Center

In 2007 warm temperatures, cloudless skies, and winds combined to make that year’s summertime melting especially severe. The sea ice extent in September 2007 was by far the lowest on record. A modest recovery in 2008 made that year the second lowest on record.

As we entered the summer of 2009, the question was: whither Arctic Sea ice? Would it continue the upward trend begun in 2008, or would it dip back down perhaps establishing a new record? We now have the answer. The National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) reports that 2009 showed another uptick in sea ice extent relative to 2007, but continued the long-term downward trend. The year 2009 now ranks third for the lowest summer sea ice extent, coming in behind 2008 and 2007 in the 30-year satellite record. The 2009 minimum of 5.10 million square kilometers (1.97 million square miles), while larger than the previous two years, is still well below the average for the past 30 years.

Ice Sheet Melting Picks Up the Pace

Against this backdrop a paper published online today in Geophysical Research Letters by Isabella Velicogna of the University of California, Irvine, shows that not only are both the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets melting, but their rate of melting is accelerating over time.

Using satellite gravity data collected from GRACE, the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (April 2002 – February 2009), Velicogna found that:

  • the annual mass loss from the Greenland ice sheet increased from 137 gigatons in 2002-2003 to 286 gigatons in 2007-2009;
  • in Antarctica the annual mass loss increased from 104 gigatons in 2002-2006 to 246 gigatons in 2006-2009.

In both cases the rate of loss increased by more than 100 gigatons/yr. In case you were wondering, 100 gigatons are 100 billion tons or about 25 trillion gallons of water — that’s enough water to fill about 40 million Olympic sized pools.

CO2, Climate and Ice Coupling

So what was the extent of sea ice and polar glaciers the last time atmospheric concentrations matched today’s level of about 390 ppm? A new technique that extends the coupled climate/carbon dioxide (CO2) record from 800,000 years ago to 20 million years ago has an answer. Aradhna Tripati of the University of California, Los Angeles, and colleagues were able to extend the atmospheric CO2 record by developing a technique that derives atmospheric CO2 from the boron-to-calcium ratios found in foraminifera shells collected from sediments in the Pacific Ocean.

Their new record, published in ScienceExpress last week, shows that the last time CO2 levels were sustained at levels similar to today’s was between 15 and 20 million years ago, a time when:

  • temperatures were roughly 3 to 6 degrees Celsius (5 to 11 degrees Fahrenheit) warmer than today,
  • there was very little ice on Greenland or Antarctica and no permanent sea ice in the Arctic, and
  • sea level was about 25 to 40 meters (80-130 feet) higher.

Makes you wonder about setting 450 ppm as the target for stabilizing CO2 concentrations — over the long term, will that be low enough?

Document Actions
  • Send this
  • Print this

Antarctica ice loss

Posted by MattN at Oct 14, 2009 11:51 AM
How do you reconcile the loss in Antarctic ice mass with the fact that it has been getting significantly colder in Antarctica for the last 3 decades? That would seem to indicate no correlation with temperature, but perhaps with precipitation amounts instead.

BTW, there's no way Antarctca is "melting", particularly in the interior of the continent where it is virually never above freezing. Sublimating, perhaps, but not "melting." It is entirely too cold.

Dr. Chameides responds -

Posted by Erica Rowell (Editor) at Oct 14, 2009 04:31 PM
MattN, The mass of a glacier is determined by the difference between accumulation (often near the center where temperatures are lowest) and loss along the edges. The data suggest that losses along the edges are accelerating and probably from below because of contact with warmer ocean water.

Ice Ice baby

Posted by MattN at Oct 14, 2009 05:10 PM
Contact with water? Are we talking continental ice or ocean ice?

Dr. Chameides replies -

Posted by Erica Rowell (Editor) at Oct 19, 2009 08:47 AM
MattN, Come on, pay attention: http://www.nicholas.duke.edu/thegreengrok/glaciers092009

As described by Pritchard et al. in Nature (http://www.nature.com/[…]/nature08471.html): "dynamic thinning of glaciers now reaches all latitudes in Greenland, has intensified on key Antarctic grounding lines, has endured for decades after ice-shelf collapse, penetrates far into the interior of each ice sheet and is SPREADING AS ICE SHELVES THIN BY OCEAN-DRIVEN MELT." (My caps.)

Posted by Anonymous Coward at Oct 19, 2009 08:48 AM
Continental ice flows downwards to the coast, a bit like water would except the flow is much slower obviously. Continental ice then reaches sea level, breaks up into icebergs and melts. That's basically how Antartica and Greenland lose mass, except that some of the ice melts before being broken up or even before reaching the ocean obviously.

Dr. Chameides responds -

Posted by Erica Rowell (Editor) at Nov 10, 2009 12:52 PM
Coward, That's about right but not entirely. We now know that melt water on the top of the glacier can flow down fissures and creeks and then flow underneath the glacier to the sea. This can greatly accelerate the rate of melting.

about The Green Grok
Dean Chameides

We are on an unsustainable course. While world populations and consumption grow, resources diminish and global warming threatens our way of life. We must find a more sustainable path. But how?

In The Green Grok, Dr. Bill Chameides elucidates causes of and potential remedies for environmental change and identifies pathways towards a more sustainable future.

meet team Grok »

Grok video

Double-click on video for a larger version (for best quality click youtube's HQ button).

A Cautionary Tale of Trees

City Parks: Great Places to Visit and Good for the Environment

DIY: Eight Tips for a More Sustainable Food Shopping Trip

more Grok videos »

Grok series

Cap and Trade In 6 parts »

Cash for Clunkers A series from 2009 »

Coal Ash Ongoing series »

Electronic Waste Ongoing series »

Global Warming and Predictions
of an Impending Ice Age
In 4 parts »

Senators on the Climate Bill Fence Ongoing series »

The Smart Grid Part 1 » :: Part 2 »