Personal tools
You are here: Home
  NICHOLAS INSIDER: get the inside scoop on duke's school of the environment
      learn about us through:  THE GREEN GROK   |   student blogs   |   travel blogs   |   multimedia   |   my nicholas (profiles)   |   itunesu   |    facebook   |   insider home

Did you not find what you were looking for? Try the Advanced Search to refine your search.

Search results 5 items matching your search terms

Subscribe to an always-updated feed of these search terms

National Academies Kick Off Climate Study with Summit
Scientists, policy makers, and corporate execs are descending on Washington, D.C., to discuss America’s long-term response to climate change. What to expect? by erica last modified Mar 31, 2009 12:36 PM — filed under: , , , , , , , , — Relevance: 1%
Memo to CNN.com: You Got It Wrong
It’s great when reporters call you for your opinion. It’s even better when they feature a quote from you in the story. And it’s better yet when it’s from an ... by erica last modified Aug 31, 2009 02:55 PM — filed under: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , — Relevance: 1%
Companies Calling for Carbon Caps: And Then There Were 26
Amid a growing debate between a carbon tax and cap and trade and reports of congressional rifts between so-called brown states and green states, one unlikely ... by erica last modified Mar 16, 2009 12:10 PM — filed under: , , , , , , , , , , , — Relevance: 1%
Is the Conservative-Friendly Carbon Tax a Regressive Flat Tax In Disguise?
What’s wrong with this picture? Conservatives, such as the members of <i>Wall Street Journal</i>'s editorial board, are talking up a carbon tax instead of a ... by erica last modified Aug 27, 2009 09:40 AM — filed under: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , — Relevance: 1%
WSJ Climate Naysayer Has New Culprit: Big Business
News flash from the op-ed pages of the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>: we must stop climate change legislation. Why? Because big business wants to make money. by erica last modified May 28, 2009 09:00 AM — filed under: , , , , , , , , , , , — Relevance: 1%